
The Wide Open Race for 2025
The path to the top of the 2025 NHL Draft remains remarkably unclear heading into the final months of the scouting season. Unlike recent years that featured consensus generational talents, this class presents a cluster of prospects separated by narrow margins, leaving lottery teams without obvious franchise saviors. The uncertainty extends beyond just the first overall selection—analysts remain divided on the composition of the top five, with legitimate arguments supporting forwards, defensemen, and goaltenders alike.
This volatility stems partly from the historical draft trends that typically favor high-end centers, yet the 2025 group features elite defensemen challenging that orthodoxy. Teams holding premium selections face unenviable decisions between immediate impact and long-term projection, with several prospects showing divergent floor and ceiling scenarios.
Top Prospects Grid
| Rank | Player | Pos | Team | League | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porter Martone | RW | Brampton Steelheads | OHL | 6’3″ | 198 |
| 2 | Logan Hensler | D | USNTDP | USHL | 6’2″ | 194 |
| 3 | James Hagens | C | Boston College | HE | 5’10” | 172 |
| 4 | Caleb Desnoyers | C | Moncton Wildcats | QMJHL | 6’2″ | 185 |
| 5 | Anton Frondell | C | Djurgårdens IF | HockeyAllsvenskan | 5’11” | 176 |
| 6 | Roger McQueen | C | Brandon Wheat Kings | WHL | 6’5″ | 203 |
Key Insights
Defensemen are occupying higher real estate than anticipated twelve months ago, with TSN’s Draft Tracker showing three blueliners in the top ten for the first time since 2018. Logan Hensler’s shutdown capabilities combined with offensive upside have created genuine debate about whether he warrants consideration over the consensus forward leaders.
The drop-off after the elite tier appears steeper than usual. Scouts characterize this as a “three-and-a-half player draft” through the top ten, suggesting teams outside the lottery may face slimmer pickings for immediate contributors. This perception has intensified trade speculation among clubs holding mid-first-round selections, with several general managers reportedly willing to package picks for established young talent rather than gamble on projection.
Complete First Round Projection
| Pick | Team | Selection | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Jose Sharks | Porter Martone | RW |
| 2 | Chicago Blackhawks | Logan Hensler | D |
| 3 | New York Islanders | James Hagens | C |
| 4 | Nashville Predators | Caleb Desnoyers | C |
| 5 | Utah Hockey Club | Anton Frondell | C |
| 6 | Boston Bruins | Roger McQueen | C |
| 7 | Buffalo Sabres | Max Graham | LW |
| 8 | Montreal Canadiens | Benjamin Kevan | G |
| 9 | Philadelphia Flyers | Matthew Schaefer | D |
| 10 | Seattle Kraken | Christian Humphreys | C |
| 11 | Calgary Flames | Mikhail Klyuev | LW |
| 12 | Ottawa Senators | Hayden Smith | D |
| 13 | New Jersey Devils | Beckett Hendrickson | C |
| 14 | Buffalo Sabres | Xavier Daigle | D |
| 15 | Vegas Golden Knights | Teddy Stiga | C |
| 16 | Pittsburgh Penguins | Sascha Boumedienne | D |
| 17 | Toronto Maple Leafs | Henry Ford | D |
| 18 | Minnesota Wild | Jackson Smith | C |
| 19 | Chicago Blackhawks | Oliver Tiegs | RW |
| 20 | Detroit Red Wings | Vadim Moroz | LW |
| 21 | Colorado Avalanche | Tyler Duke | D |
| 22 | Edmonton Oilers | Marcus Gidlof | G |
| 23 | Carolina Hurricanes | Tyler Hopkins | C |
| 24 | New York Rangers | Blake Montgomery | LW |
| 25 | Tampa Bay Lightning | Jackson Dion | D |
| 26 | Los Angeles Kings | Colin Fitzgerald | C |
| 27 | Winnipeg Jets | Trent Swick | LW |
| 28 | Vancouver Canucks | Emil Hemming | RW |
| 29 | St. Louis Blues | Brendan D’Agostino | D |
| 30 | Washington Capitals | Noah Sinclair | C |
| 31 | Utah Hockey Club | AJ Vasko | D |
| 32 | Saskatoon Host Selection | Matthew Callow | LW |
Lottery Team Needs
San Jose holds the strongest hand with two potential franchise cornerstones already developing in Macklin Celebrini and Will Smith. Adding Porter Martone creates a formidable offensive nucleus for contention windows. Chicago faces a more complex calculation—while they covet centermen, Logan Hensler’s right-shot defensive profile fills a specific organizational void that has persisted since the teardown began.
The Islanders’ positioning at third overall presents intriguing flexibility. James Hagens offers immediate collegiate pedigree, potentially accelerating their retooling timeline alongside Bo Horvat and Brock Nelson. Meanwhile, Nashville continues stockpiling centers, viewing Caleb Desnoyers as the two-way engine necessary to support their defensive infrastructure.
Sources indicate Utah’s front office favors Frondell’s professional experience in Sweden’s second tier over younger alternatives, believing his readiness aligns with Clayton Keller’s prime years. Elite Prospects notes Frondell’s standout performance against men significantly older than him this season.
Draft Timeline
- : NHL Draft Lottery conducted during Stanley Cup Playoffs
- : First Round at Sphere, Las Vegas
- : Rounds 2-7 at Sphere, Las Vegas
- : Final NCS Rankings released
- : NHL Awards (draft week festivities begin)
Clarity on Class Uncertainty
Multiple outlets have characterized this draft as “weak,” a designation that requires contextual nuance. While lacking the McDavid/Matthews/Bedard tier of generational certainty, the depth through sixty picks rivals the 2019 draft that produced numerous NHL regulars after slower initial development curves.
The variance in rankings reflects genuine stylistic diversity rather than quality deficits. Sportsnet’s analysis indicates scouts agree on top-twelve talent levels but disagree profoundly on positional value and timeline translation. Teams prioritizing immediate help may reach for older prospects, while rebuilders favor high-ceiling seventeen-year-olds requiring AHL incubation.
Goaltender Benjamin Kevan’s rise into the top ten represents another point of contention. Traditional wisdom avoids early goalie selections, yet NHL Central Scouting lists him as the top North American netminder by significant margins. Montreal’s reported interest suggests organizational comfort with developmental variance for elite goaltending prospects.
Scouting Analysis
Martone’s 92-point production in the OHL masks subtle concerns about his defensive engagement, though his power play Quarterbacking and in-tight finishing project as elite NHL skills. His skating stride efficiency has improved measurably since January, quelling earlier mobility doubts.
Hensler combines transitional shutdown defense with an increasingly active offensive stick. His gap control against rush chances rivals recent top-pairing selections like Quinn Hughes and Evan Bouchard at equivalent ages, though he lacks their dynamic puck-carrying flair. The central scouting reports highlight his penalty kill anticipation as translatable immediately.
Hagens operates at a pace that occasionally outstrips his Boston College teammates, creating high-danger chances through layered offensive zone pressure. His size limitations—standing below six feet—generate physical projection questions for playoff hockey, yet his compete level and puck protection technique suggest adaptation capability.
Desnoyers offers the safest floor among the top group. His 200-foot consistency and faceoff proficiency project as middle-six certainties even if offensive upside caps as secondary scoring. Moncton’s deployment of him against opposition top lines since November demonstrates coaching trust in his defensive maturity.
Inside the War Rooms
Martone sees the ice like few players in this class. When he’s moving his feet, you can’t stop him. The question is whether that motor runs consistently at the next level.
— Eastern Conference Scout, The Hockey News
Hensler walked into our building and dominated physically against nineteen-year-olds. That strength component isn’t teachable at eighteen. Everything else is refinement.
— Western Conference Director of Amateur Scouting
There’s legitimate debate in our room about Hagens versus Frondell. The Swedish kid plays a man’s game already; Hagens has higher offensive peaks but smaller windows.
— Anonymous Assistant General Manager
Summary
The 2025 NHL Draft resists easy narratives. Without a consensus phenom, teams must rely on organizational philosophy and specific roster construction needs rather than defaulting to “best player available” scripts. The defensive renaissance at the top reflects broader league trends valuing puck-moving blueliners who suppress transition chances before they develop.
For lottery clubs, the decision between Martone’s ceiling and Hensler’s security defines divergent franchise paths. Those selections will reshape organizational trajectories for the next decade, even if immediate impact remains limited. The draft’s true depth will emerge only after development cycles complete, likely revealing hidden gems beyond the lottery spotlight.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is the 2025 NHL Draft Lottery?
The 2025 NHL Draft Lottery will be conducted on , during the Stanley Cup Playoffs broadcast window.
Where will the 2025 NHL Draft be held?
The 2025 NHL Draft takes place at the Sphere in Las Vegas, Nevada. The first round occurs on , with rounds two through seven following on .
Who is projected to be the first overall pick in 2025?
Porter Martone of the Brampton Steelheads (OHL) currently holds the top spot in most projections, though Logan Hensler and James Hagens remain legitimate alternatives depending on which team wins the lottery.
Is the 2025 NHL Draft considered weak?
The class lacks a consensus generational talent like Connor Bedard or Connor McDavid, but scouts consider the depth through the first three rounds comparable to recent draft years. The top tier features high-quality prospects separated by narrow margins rather than clear drop-offs.
Which teams hold the most draft capital in 2025?
The Buffalo Sabres possess two first-round selections (their own and Vegas’s), while Chicago holds two picks in the top twenty. San Jose, despite likely picking first overall, traded their second first-rounder to Utah in previous transactions.



